Humanity

Men Into Women?

 

It was reported in the National Press that a researcher who had lost her job for making supposed ‘transphobic’ remarks will tell an employment tribunal that it is a ‘biological fact’ that men cannot become women. Maya Forstater, wrote the following on her personal Twitter account that ‘men cannot change into women’ and criticised laws which allow people to ‘self-identify’ as male or female. Some of her colleagues at the think-tank the Centre For Global Development complained that her views ‘made them feel uncomfortable’ and accused her of ‘trans-phobia’.

I suggest that if the criteria for disapproval of a comment made in a workplace is one of being made uncomfortable, then what about Maya Forstater’s discomfort. Is she not to be protected in the same way as her accusers? The answer to that is no, her opinions are no longer tolerated by a society which has decided all human knowledge from scientific to common sense is to be overturned by a philosophy dreamed up and imposed on our culture over the last decade. The playing field is now so tilted  that it is impossible for one side to score a point while the other side can do nothing else but score points. The law has become much more than an ass, it has become a venomous snake programmed to strike at victims set up in advance. Hold the correct opinion or else keep silent. Every dictatorship uses this prescriptive formula. A modern expression is Group Think. The message is clear, do not deviate one millimetre from the post modern script. A preliminary hearing at an employment tribunal were informed that her legal team will argue that Forstater’s views are a ‘philosophical belief’. Under the Equalities Act 2010, it is illegal to discriminate against employees over such beliefs. Miss Forstater is expected to say in evidence later this week that:

‘I believe being male or female is an immutable (word meaning unchanging over time or unable to be changed) biological fact, not a feeling or an identity,’ and ‘I believe that a person’s sex should not be conflated with the idea of “gender”, “gender identities” or “gender expression”. And ‘I believe that it is impossible to change sex or lose your sex. No change of clothes or hairstyle, no plastic surgery, no accident or illness, no course of hormones, no force of will or social conditioning, no declaration, can turn a female person into a male, or a male person into a female.’

Well said, but to say it is to risk a modern form of martyrdom. The lunatics have taken over the asylum. Nature still acts as if the rules have not changed one iota since males and females first appeared on the planet. We are in the absurd position of screaming with hysteria about our persistent and dangerous meddling in nature’s environmental rules, while pursuing the exact opposite agenda with regard to sexuality. Scattering gender choices in the air like confetti has become perfectly acceptable. A movement such as this gains momentum with every novel advance pushing a little deeper into the void. Below is a video on the subject of male pregnancy. Its not impossible! A male could give birth to a baby. However I do not expect a queue of men to form outside the appropriate clinics. Now if you are a seahorse reading this, then no problem…

 

Unlocking Artificial Intelligence

 

Research into A.I. has to some degree surpassed human calculating capacity. Problem solving with speed and accuracy has enabled computing power sufficient for computers to beat world champions at Chess and Go, and can even compete with professionals at games like Poker. However clever and able robots with state of the art artificial intelligence may get, their human creator’s are going to struggle to move them into areas which make humans humane. They may in the future begin to perceive the world around them as we do, even though this is a vast problem to solve. And solving it could create a nightmare scenario.

 

Another great problem is human motility. Compare a ballet dancer or a gymnast to a robot and they are seemingly far apart in ability. However much greater are those areas of human behaviour which are most important to us: love, consciousness, self awareness, empathy, value and belief systems, the aesthetic appreciation of beauty and so on. About some of these science is still in the dark ages of understanding.

Just take one of the above: holding a value or belief. These can be so strong that a person may be prepared to sacrifice their life. A human being is designed to look after itself, and yet it is capable of self sacrifice, giving up its own self interest entirely. Humans will voluntarily get together to risk their lives for others, doctors, police, mountain rescue teams, firefighters, RNLI, the list could go on and on. An A.I. could be programmed to do such things, but placing a value system in a robot could lead to a million pound artificial human committing suicide because it had failed to do some small task properly; like pouring a teaspoonful of sugar into a cup and stirring an invalid patient’s tea. This is its reason to exist, to keep the patient happy, and it has failed. Given a simple conscience this machine could breakdown. If it could feel any depth of shame it might seek to end its existence. A value system is extremely difficult to moderate. How much value do we place on a thing or an objective or an idea. A.I. is admittedly a marvel of invention. A project which has consumed vast amounts of finance, ingenuity and computing power to make them operate as they do; but they are still nothing close to even mimicking humanity. I am not suggesting this is a primary aim, but it gets close to it. Its imaginary fulfilment is conjured up in the film industry in multiple forms, some good, some bad, so positively evil. Who knows what may happen. A competition is certainly on to beat humans in areas where A.I. has the potential to do so.

The complexity involved in creating an artificial human is immense. And yet what about considering the model upon which AI is being developed? My point is this, if the most intelligent of the most intelligent species on earth has over the last seventy years got this far, and is still on the lower slopes of Everest in replicating something even remotely close to fully human, then what kind of intelligence produced ordinary examples of this phenomena like you and I?